IPhone Vs. Everybody: Battle Of The Smartphone Death Grips

When reports started flooding in that Apple’s new iPhone 4 suffers from a serious antenna conundrum that disrupts voice and data signals, Apple fired in trade at its critics and competitors by claiming that all smartphones be inflicted with the same issue. But do they? To see how common a conundrum antenna attenuation is, we took the iPhone 4 and five of its top smartphone competitors into the field to place Apple’s claims to the test. Here’s what we found.

How We Tested

We tested five smartphones that compete with the iPhone 4: the HTC Nexus One (T-Mobile), the HTC EVO 4G (Sprint; not on 4G), the RIM BlackBerry Bold 9650 (Sprint), the Motorola Droid X (Verizon), and the Samsung Animated (AT&T). First we measured all model’s signal strength when held normally. Then we tested all handset while holding it in its death grip–the position where our hand covered the phone’s antenna most effectively.

Because signal loss has far more severe real-world implications in environments where cellular coverage is already poor, we chose to test in a weak signal environment that we had earlier identified in our ongoing testing of 3G network performance. The place we chose was Crestline Drive (Google Earth), virtually San Francisco’s Twin Peaks; we be inflicted with consistently obtained poor coverage from all four of the major networks at this place.

We measured signal strength in decibels per milliwatt (dBm), a standard way of expressing the power of a radio signal in relation to 1 milliwatt. In high-signal areas–for example, in locations where a smartphone user stands close to a cell tower–a signal measured at -51 dBm is the highest (and best) that can be achieved. In poor coverage areas, phones can form a junction with and hold a invite until the signal weakens to approximately -113, at which top the invite drops and the network connection fails.

To measure the real-world implications of signal loss, we tested both data speed performance and voice invite quality. For data speed, we used the FCC-endorsed Ookla testing app to measure upload speeds and download speeds. We ran three consecutive speed tests on all phone at all place, and then picked the best upload and download speeds of the three.

The voice-invite tests were more subjective. We placed calls to a common community number, listening for static, jitter, delay, dropped calls, or failure to form a junction with.

We stress that these tests are informal, nonscientific and by no means definitive. Nevertheless, we believe that we got a very excellent look at the death grip in action, and a reasonably excellent perception of how legitimate Steve Jobs’s statements at the Antenna-gate press conference were.

Signal Loss Consequences

In its before tests of signal loss of the iPhone 4 when held, AnandTech found that the iPhone lost about 24 dBm of signal strength. In high signal areas, AnandTech surmised, the IPhone 4 can sustain a loss of 24 dBm and still maintain a clear voice invite and a high-speed data connection. But in low signal areas, that level of signal loss can reduce the signal to a top where calls degrade and decline.

So 24 dBm is the magic number–the standard measurement of the death grip’s look on the iPhone, and the benchmark we used in looking at the phones we informally tested. Our consequences for signal loss due to death grip appear in the chart below. (Delight click on the thumbnail to see the full-size chart).

We measured death-grip signal loss by comparing the signal strength (in dBm) of all phone when held “normally” (flat in hand) to the corresponding signal strength (also in dBm) of the phone when held in a death grip (blocking the phone’s antenna).

In our “weak signal” place, the Samsung Mesmerize on AT&T’s service had the greatest amount of signal loss–even when we held the phone loosely at its bottom (where the phone’s antenna is located). The Mesmerize incurred a 37 percent decrease in signal, dropping from -81 to -111 dBm.

The HTC EVO was the then-most strongly affected by the death grip: Its dBm reading dropped from -87 to -101 dBm, a loss of 16 percent of signal strength–still far a reduced amount of than the Samsung suffered.

The Nexus One and the Motorola Droid X all lost marginal amounts of signal strength in their respective death grips, with declines of 6.2 percent and 3.9 percent, respectively–nothing approaching the iPhone 4’s loss.

Oddly, the death grip really improved the signal strength of the RIM BlackBerry Bold, which jumped 12.15 percent when we held it with our fingers forceful at both edges of the phone.

Data Download Speeds

To know the implications of the death grip on innumerable phones, we looked for data speed decreases that seemed to result from it. We tested data speed loss on all phones apart from the BlackBerry Bold and obtained the consequences listed in the chart below (the Ookla test is not available from BlackBerry App World, and the alternative speed test application we used bent wildly inaccurate consequences). (Delight click the thumbnail to see the full-size chart).

informal tests of the iPhone 4?s performance when held in its death grip, which we conducted when the phone had solely come out.

Voice Invite Tests

For another look at death-grip implications, we conducted some limited voice-invite tests, listening for dropped calls or for calls with noticeable static or delay. Of all the phones in our tests, single the iPhone 4, the HTC Nexus One, and the Samsung Mesmerize showed noteworthy signs of invite quality degradation as a result of the death grip. Calls on all three phones sounded garbled, and on two of the phones–the Nexus One and the iPhone 4–we experienced person dropped calls.

Unlikely Death Grips

Though it seems completely plausible that an iPhone 4 user force hold the device in such a way that the grip would interfere with the antenna and reduce the phone’s signal strength, the innumerable death grips required to attenuate the antennas of the other phones we tested seem far a reduced amount of likely in the real world.

For instance, the death grip for the EVO 4G involves cupping your hand around the top of the phone. You wouldn’t purposely hold your phone be fond of this; it feels very awkward and makes accidentally arresting the volume buttons on the phone’s spine much more likely. Even more unnatural is the death grip for the Droid X: We had to use a two hands to grasp the bottom and the top of the phone simultaneously. Other death grips, though a modest a reduced amount of exotic, still felt decidedly artificial.

Part of the wits the iPhone is uncommon is that Apple built its antenna into the metal housing that forms the outside edge of the phone. This represents a dramatic departure from the way most antennas are built into phones–namely, inside the shell and usually at the bottom of the phone. As a result, the iPhone 4’s exposed antenna is much more susceptible to interference (attenuation) from the hand of the self holding the phone. This risky (and apparently not completely tested) top go now looks be fond of an epic fail–a cautionary tale that will be retold at drafting tables for years to come.

The Bottom Line

Apple’s assertion that antenna attenuation is a common conundrum on smartphones is visibly real. Every one of the phones we tested experienced person some degree of attenuation when held firmly in a position that covered the device’s antenna. On the other hand, our informal tests indicate that uncommon phone models do not exhibit attenuation to the same degree–and the iPhone 4 performed far worse when attenuated than did most of its competitors in our tests. Most significantly, the iPhone 4–nearly surely because of its “innovative” external antenna–was the single phone we tested that has a distinct (and easily accessible) weak stain capable of ending a invite with a single touch.

For essential information in the sphere of Free Traffic System – delight make sure to study the web site. The time has come when concise info is truly within your reach, use this possibility.